5 Apr 2025 9:14 pm
jerrab » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
In a courtroom setting, it's crucial to only testify about what you personally know and observed, avoiding speculation, assumptions, or information you haven't directly experienced
---------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
they should have not asked anything more than he knew. all he knew was that kennedy was shot once connally was shot once kennedy was shot again and he said so.
------------
anything about oswald being the sole shooter was just speculation and all those lawyers knew that.//////////////
he would not argue against the commission with all that political clout.
all those lawyers knew that speculation is not allowable in court.
neither connally saw oswald or heard oswald.